TR-3B Plasma Torus Anti-Gravity Centrifuge Engine





User comments:


[2012-05-23 07:09:45] Blackdragon719 - creating the same ...

creating the same effects

[2012-05-23 07:09:26] Blackdragon719 - now y dont they try ...

now y dont they try super heating the fluids like in the center of the earth useing a denser magnetic metal spinning

[2012-05-21 12:27:41] MASH2222 - Ununpentium - ...

Ununpentium - Element 115 is the key liquid. Bob Lazar mentions this. Search Wikipedia.

[2012-05-20 06:09:10] Raven105X - Not only is this ...

Not only is this possible, at this point in our backwards technological development, it is also much easier due to the fact that the knowledge on how to build large crystalline structures devoid of flaws is either nonexistent or tightly controlled. Keep in mind that a fluid with zero viscosity at such high ur-toroidal (see Viktor Schauberger's work) rotational velocities would drain out of any hole or fracture, no matter how tiny - so a physical container is not much of an option anyways.

[2012-05-19 16:13:44] RootofYishay - Rob Lazar was right

Rob Lazar was right

[2012-05-19 03:36:27] DarkysLPs - Oh wow. Just...wow.

Oh wow. Just...wow.

[2012-05-17 12:24:15] oKARWAIo - Aahaha, 'Lying ...

Aahaha, 'Lying government bastards!' Really interesting video. Well thought out, thanks

[2012-05-11 09:21:28] luishion - Metallic hydrogen ...

Metallic hydrogen theres your fluid ...check it out

[2012-05-09 12:38:46] lavista4u - Tr3b are ...

Tr3b are responsible for half of the plane crashes all over the world..Google the latest plane crash in pakistan ...one could clearly see triangle shape craft hovering over the crash site

[2012-05-08 18:20:06] sverige38 - No reasonable ...

No reasonable explanation, just basic witchcraft. UFO:s is Satans invention trying to mislead people from the true and living God.

[2012-05-08 09:03:31] stylezz1234 - Isn't it possible ...

Isn't it possible to contain it with a magnetic field?

[2012-05-03 23:47:16] Emachesen - You dont even know ...

You dont even know what gravity truly is... Lying nasa bastards

[2012-05-02 14:25:29] marioclub12 - hmmmm...interesting ...

hmmmm...interesting. Thank you very much for taking your time to explain it to me! I will try to figure some sort of container out (busy thinking)

[2012-05-02 03:37:21] trekie33 - Basically. The ...

Basically. The electromagnets accelerate the fluid... To provide the angular acceleration necessary to keep the fluid moving in a circle, instead of tangentially exploding outward, you would need to have some sort of containment. Sadly however, the fluid would inevitably reach a critical velocity in which no known method of containment would be able to provide a sufficient apposing force. Supercolliders must have a very large radius to contain even a single particle moving at these speeds.

[2012-05-02 03:09:17] marioclub12 - isn't that where ...

isn't that where the electromagnetism comes to play? (activating one at a time) Sorry, I'm not too familiar with field forces yet. But what you're saying is that since it is constantly changing direction because it is colliding with the sides of the container constantly. And because it is flowing so fast, it will break it? (not quite clear on what you're saying)

[2012-05-02 02:23:05] trekie33 - Well not exactly. ...

Well not exactly. You see, inertia is "the resistance of any physical object to a change in its state of motion or rest". (Wikipedia) While momentum is the vector quantity represented by the product of the mass and velocity (P=MV). So in this sense inertia would be more relevant. A superfluid, having no friction, could be slowly speed up to near light speed, however it would take an effectively infinite force to stop the molecules in the fluid from moving in a straight tangential path.

[2012-05-02 01:59:04] trekie33 - Well not exactly. ...

Well not exactly. You are getting this from Einsteins formula E=MC^2. So logically then you could say that mass increases as you approach the speed of light, right? Wrong, you see this is a relativistic effect. The mass does not increase but its momentum increases and thus it acts as though the mass were increased. The actual mass increase occurs to what is known as "relativistic mass", which has to do with the fact that time speeds up near the speed of light. Conservation of mass is the law.

[2012-05-02 01:17:02] marioclub12 - isn't that more of ...

isn't that more of a momentum problem than an inertia? (just trying to learn, I'm in 8th grade right now, really fascinating stuff right here)

[2012-05-02 00:50:54] trekie33 - Friction has ...

Friction has nothing to do with inertia, yes it will not slow down however things don't just angularly accelerate for no reason. As you no doubt learned in high school physics any object, or in this case the molecules in the fluid, will move in a straight line unless acted upon by an outside force. This is represented by the formula F=M((V^2)/r). The velocity will increase asymptotically to the speed of light do to the lack of friction. Have fun finding something to overcome that force.

[2012-05-02 00:32:23] marioclub12 - not if it's ...

not if it's frictionless :D

[2012-04-27 03:29:11] trekie33 - Only problem is ...

Only problem is that the fluid will rip the container apart, and or overcome the magnetic containment field once it gets up to a sufficient speed.

[2012-04-26 08:15:00] crankitup110 - If you use ...

If you use monoatomic gold, perhaps heating it would instead of cooling would have the effect?

[2012-04-21 18:02:03] Nomoreidsleft - Can you re-engineer ...

Can you re-engineer yourself to be less dense? Even if you can make a vehicle that weighs nothing, you still need to lift yourself. All this antigravity business is a moot point. The fact is that once you're in space gravity is irrelevant. What's needed is a propulsion method which doesn't involve using oxygen.

[2012-04-18 10:57:53] emerychandler - the previuse ...

the previuse president of lockheed skukworks said the he produced an anti-gravity effect using supermagnets fixed to the same pole of another, the force was chenneled into energy and the energy went to the space around it, dropped it from a second loor comparitive to a ball and let them go at the same time. the ball hit first the magnets had suspension.

[2012-04-17 02:56:07] GameRep101 - why not gallium ...

why not gallium instead of mercury

[2012-04-15 06:05:34] GHQST62 - Nevermind Pounds85 ...

Nevermind Pounds85 has the same idea. do the opposite of how this could be done, then revert it to what you were looking for, if you look at the simple things of your method and use it as it's opposite, it could be easier. Instead of creating a super liquid, create a suuper solid.

[2012-04-15 05:48:19] GHQST62 - Neverminding ...

Neverminding outerspace, where maybe the type of technology was set to work for, we have to think opposites, perhaps liquid and solid both flat and round, maybe working from the other side of the thought may work.

[2012-04-14 20:30:38] stephenstiffler1 - naturally no one ...

naturally no one has used or experimented with any of the superheavies that Bob Lazar mentioned because they are ostensibly only theoretical. one would be remiss not to at least entertain the notion that they are in use in advanced black ops development.

[2012-04-14 03:49:13] PantheraAtrox - 8:49...wow.

8:49...wow.

[2012-04-12 01:49:10] bernzeppi - Congratulations on ...

Congratulations on the fastest rapid fire bunch of BS on the youtubes. Extraordinary!

[2012-04-12 01:46:58] bernzeppi - Condensed matter ...

Condensed matter plasma... Heh heh... anyone see the problem? A speed of light spinning torus... Anyone see the problem? Bose Einstein condensate rotating... Anyone see the problem? Iron embedded in mercury... Anyone see the problem?

[2012-04-12 01:42:32] bernzeppi - Fruitcake anyone?

Fruitcake anyone?

[2012-04-11 15:55:35] ThekZnation - It will reach mass ...

It will reach mass so high, that it will create gravitational field of it's own, thus the planet doesn't pull it anymore. Or so I understood.

[2012-04-08 18:04:56] TheMysteryd - The mass could get ...

The mass could get incredibly large from approching C, though I understand your premis. The precesive forces acting on it (if built on Earth) requires it to be gimballed magneticly and in a perfect vacuum. If someone actually builds one of these things there could be the starting of a black hole and an event horizon. If it effects gravity, time also will be effected, as they are of one and the same fabric. Best to build it out far away from too many gravity wells in deep space. A knowledge bomb.

[2012-04-01 23:40:20] thepcguy01 - this is crap. If an ...

this is crap. If an object, in this case a fluid, gets close to the speed of light, the mass of that object will increase thus making it's gravitational pull stronger not weaker. If you don't believe me, search on google for inertial mass.

[2012-04-01 19:57:09] huzanaaier - Dude what are you ...

Dude what are you talking about? Force is not direction plus velocity and gravity is not energy and energy is not charge plus current. Where are you getting this from?

[2012-04-01 19:22:05] Mesdriver - Crap

Crap

[2012-03-30 14:59:26] Dave1ization - well to make the ...

well to make the superfluid is easy. Cool helium atoms close to absolute zero and they start behaving as a single quantum object rather than a group of individual atoms. At this temperature, the friction that normally exists between atoms, and between atoms and other objects, vanishes, creating what is known as a superfluid.

[2012-03-29 18:22:39] todaywiththeCJB - WOW! This video ...

WOW! This video might be deleted!

[2012-03-29 14:31:57] bridgetroll9 - Force = (Direction ...

Force = (Direction + Velocity) Gravity = (Direction + Velocity) Wind = (Direction + Velocity) River = (Direction + Velocity) Energy = (Charge + Current) Charge (Static) Current (Dynamic) Charge controls the static direction of Gravity. Current controls the dynamic velocity of Gravity. Gravity is Energy and Energy is Gravity. Energy forces us down. We do not force ourselves down.

[2012-03-25 22:31:20] EnslaveTV - INTERESTING. :D

INTERESTING. :D

[2012-03-23 16:29:50] DnKatMercado - or huctchington ...

or huctchington effect?

[2012-03-20 04:32:39] indiasinindigo - lithium oxide, rare ...

lithium oxide, rare earth magnet particles, diatematious earth (razor sharp particles), programmed quartz, the rodin coil... not a scientist but am curious about effects of small spherical particles of gold, silver found in certain springs(ecuador) and mono-atomic extra-terrestrial metals like rhodium and irridium. also is mercury subject to low energy nuclear change

[2012-03-20 04:20:29] indiasinindigo - Dr. Octagon ...

Dr. Octagon Figured this shit out years ago... Get with it.

[2012-03-19 19:52:25] INEEDMOREZOMBIES115 - Same response NASA ...

Same response NASA gave us.

[2012-03-15 07:57:35] trreames - What if focus is ...

What if focus is put more on what specifically creates the "field"... Look at the input parameters and what are their effects. Example what is effect of different diameters the mecury moves thru? What is the effect if "stir rods" were placed in line of travel to create a disurbance? Istead of adding as "chemical" what if chunks of something is added. For example ball bearings? ... I have no access to test any of this but would love to here of anyones findings.

[2012-03-15 07:37:28] pounds85 - U use anti gravity ...

U use anti gravity to travel. By doing the opposite of gravity u do what? You repel anything made of gravity, which happens to be pretty much everything. If u want to figure out how to do something efficiently u just use it's opposite.

HTML "сopy-paste":