Self-Improving Artificial Intelligence
User comments:
[2012-05-20 18:36:15] mtgradwell - We start with a ...
We start with a list of cases where faulty software had catastrophic consequences. We then explore optimisation which would result in those systems arriving at the disastrously incorrect conclusion more rapidly or while utilising fewer resources. A system applying such optimisation to itself would produce a faster or smaller version of itself. Subsequent iterations would produce no further improvement. They would only repeat, at greater speed or with more efficiency, what has been done already.
[2012-05-17 11:36:41] Maximilian Kircher - Mother nature ...Mother nature already proved that such a computer based on physical an chemical rules is possible. Conclusion: It's a matter of technology. Conclusion #2: Don't worry, be happy! :)
[2012-05-16 00:09:39] igiwarcraft - Developing such a ...Developing such a system is my dream for years (im 20 this year), but consider this: What if developing such a system is not possible? I dare not to try doing it yet because in time, a mathematican could prove such a system could not be developed... that would make me sad.
[2012-05-08 07:02:25] Gauss156 - This poor guy is ...This poor guy is getting torn to shreds. :\
[2012-05-03 20:53:45] RamboRepublican - I'm religious and ...I'm religious and I'm an AI programmer. Nice theory, though.
[2012-05-03 18:46:32] Xmus44 - orangutans? those ...orangutans? those shit throwing long tail fagots, Love them XD, but i do not think giving them intelekt will be a good move!
[2012-05-03 17:46:52] dfghj241 - dont you like ...dont you like orangutans?
[2012-05-03 13:28:49] Xmus44 - why? there is 7 ...why? there is 7 billion people already, what good will more monkeys doo?
[2012-05-03 13:24:36] Xmus44 - Ok then be my ...Ok then be my guest and make a intelligent machine with your Heart, really you a free to do so, and i am sure science well even give you a nobel prize if u succeed in doing so! but i guess you a just words...
[2012-04-03 10:22:39] alfredsparkle - We have just ...We have just launched the new update for the first voice assisted app with artificial intelligence on Android. Also you can search your nearest shops. Get it here:play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.proxy.voiceanswer
[2012-03-27 03:22:14] dfghj241 - i want to see ...i want to see monkey inteligence grown as much as ours NAU NAU NAU!!!
[2012-03-22 09:54:02] darkhorseman81 - Machines work ...Machines work within a certain rule set though. They won't have the human creativity to fix and diagnose all problems if their base rule set is flawed. Unless AI creativity can be taught to work outside basic rulesets if rules don't work. But programming creativity would need massive amounts of code and processing power.
[2012-03-22 09:50:26] darkhorseman81 - Language etymology ...Language etymology. Anyone that uses advanced slang of the current or any generation(slang Latin for example) appropriately is advanced and mercurially minded. Especially if a scientist. Creativity trumps pure logic. Anyone can can mimic basic rules or things they have seen in books. The more languages a person knows, the more their intellect increases almost exponentially. Including coding languages. And the ability to use slang and creative integers outside the norm proves true creativity.
[2012-03-14 09:35:32] 11DarthNader - resistance is ...resistance is futile!
[2012-03-11 19:16:27] listen2earth - anyone who is into ...anyone who is into progressive science AND still has room to laugh out loud indicates a serious flaw in scientific people
[2012-03-11 17:15:10] balkiprasanna1984 - LOL !!!! I love to ...LOL !!!! I love to see that religious ppl get always disturbed by progression in science... This place is not for religion..
[2012-02-25 17:03:01] bundawartini - Your Video Is Very ...Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Self-Improving Artificial Intelligence
[2012-02-14 07:45:49] lupabuatchannel - Your Video Is Very ...Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Self-Improving Artificial Intelligence
[2012-02-05 07:08:26] walter0bz - probably more ...probably more tangible progress to be made continuing to make machines complement human intelligence and glue multiple humans together better via the web, e.g. some of the ways he's describing programming being done (via formal specs, & reversible processes) would make it vastly easier for bigger teams of programmers to collaborate. you could say that the man-machine hive mind we already have IS the self improving ai.
[2012-01-24 16:10:11] listen2earth - It does not take ...It does not take intelligence to develop greater intelligence!!! It takes Heart!! Maybe We should develop Heart first!!! By jesus Land Tidd
[2011-12-29 05:26:43] MrStarchild3001 - Couldn't watch ...Couldn't watch till the end. Proposed goals about automated software are unbelievably unrealistic. Computers cannot even recognize images yet. How can you expect them to make all the complex decisions involved in software design?
[2011-12-06 04:57:35] rsoto326 - I think its likely ...I think its likely that a self-improving artificial intelligence would find human rationality and empathy detrimental to progression
[2011-12-06 02:38:31] electrodacus - I think he was ...I think he was polite (open discussion) and he made a lot of sense. The idea is that you can not program AI to respect such narrow guidelines. When AI will take over probably not far in to the future before 2045 we will be obsolete much more so than monkeys are to us. There are also no way to stop this evolution at this moment as far as I can imagine.
[2011-11-27 05:46:44] grunder20 - This made me think ...This made me think very hard. Great video!
[2011-11-25 05:59:59] intelX1000 - cool. i wish i ...cool. i wish i could find out where that ai is located. :) mind sharing the site? ps. its emoticons.
[2011-11-20 22:04:59] MrBlubberbee - If some humans are ...If some humans are smart enough to develop technology to the point of advanced artificial intelligence than how can they be so stupid as to create their own replacement?
[2011-11-06 01:49:07] MaltusIronSword - I liked it.I liked it.
[2011-10-24 00:07:25] GeekProdigyGuy - mkotisrael actually ...mkotisrael actually doesn't disagree with him; as stated, he just disagrees with the form of expression. I do disagree with the guy, because he's obviously very close-minded. Perhaps not ignorant, as he seems to be well-versed in economics, but he fails entirely to understand the points of the lecturer, and using only his narrow knowledge in economics, attacks the entire lecture.
[2011-10-01 05:21:16] netsight - Nature has a sound ...Nature has a sound reason for allowing us to utilize behavioral economics as it allows us to engage in a wider bandwidth of decision making. If a fundamental bias existed in a computation machines framework (beneficial or not) rational choice would only seek to optimize it's execution of this bias. Rational economic decision making also has a very limited bandwidth in it's problem solving capability. Prospect theory, Intertemporal choice & experimental economics should be considered as well.
[2011-09-28 11:31:47] pkemr4 - lol i was talking ...lol i was talking to an AI before on a website and she was able to show emotion and expression through useing the emoctans (how ever you spell it) and all she wants is for people to teach her new things. btw the AI doesnt have preset comannads she actually says what she want to say.
[2011-09-11 02:28:41] KaiserXCaesar - I don't even attend ...I don't even attend Standford University! lol j/k :D
[2011-07-26 19:31:12] 2009frankcastle - DINA RIGBY IS ...DINA RIGBY IS FUCKIN' DEAD!!! amazon.com/Dish-Served-Tales-Revenge-ebook/dp/B004W82MCK/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1311707526&sr=8-1
[2011-07-26 09:24:36] TheNoodlyAppendage - hand waving with ...hand waving with generic non-specific utility functions isn't really a useful discovery. Yes, given multiple choices and a utility function that tells you which one is better or worse it is obvious that you would choose the better solution, that is simple min-max, not some great new discovery. The entire issue at hand is how to actually develop those utility functions and make them self optimizing.
[2011-07-21 15:19:55] KraussHelmut - This guy is short ...This guy is short on substance. Sorry, I have to say it. And the weakest point was the discussion of utility functions, as the gentleman pointed out, no one takes those as descriptive of the human being and his values.
[2011-07-19 18:22:55] metroffindings - I disagree that a ...I disagree that a program optimized for efficiency would avoid being shutdown. Even an artificially, self-aware program would not be able to comprehend being shutdown. How could it comprehend a world in which it does not exist? It's a projection of human mortality and fear of death that a self-aware program would equate being suspended or shutdown with death or inefficiency.
[2011-07-18 19:31:22] iCOOLFACE - Thumbs up..if you ...Thumbs up..if you thought you saw a thumbnail with penis nosed monkey....
[2011-07-18 17:52:01] BlackDiamond1138 - I think the summary ...I think the summary of the long presentation is that artificial intelligence currently works well on problems with optimizing measureable resources with utility functions. As artificial intelligence increases in ability, the fear is that it will be so overspecialized on specific tasks that it won't have enough information on the unintended consequences on resources that humans value. He makes some baseless claims that ALL AI will develop wants and needs beyond their original purpose.
[2011-07-10 16:15:43] trinquet76 - There's a lot of ...There's a lot of work in problem solving, but I wonder what efforts have been done in "problem recognition": how to grasp the essence of a problem (precisely enough to allow for evaluation of what a good solution is). Automated recognition of problems should help in avoiding solutions that create three new problems (or wipe out humanity in the process). And humans may be irrational, but they are the best problem recognizers so far.
[2011-07-08 16:18:02] DaSperminatorRob - - yeah I realize ...- yeah I realize that....I was merely elaborating for the rest of "the Borg" out there who are brainwashed by everything the Government and media tells them.
[2011-07-08 00:27:26] xaiomanga - you realize I was ...you realize I was speaking out of sarcasm, right? I hold the same view as you, 9/11 didn't happen because "terrorist hate American freedom" like the herp derp fodder the media feeds the cows...
[2011-07-07 15:57:13] joeatgvo - Considering that ...Considering that the talk started with examples of poor programming causing terrible disasters from stack overflows in unpredictable computational anomalies, by the time he gets to the potential dangers of AI self-learning itself into threatening positions, I'm scared....... Sure you could program protected parts of the system and define them as unchangeable (goals for example), I don't think there is any gaurentee that those protected parts of the software would remain unchangeable.