Skewed views of science
User comments:
[2012-05-20 06:59:08] Noise509 - Science has never ...
Science has never once said that aliens put us on this planet. That's only one of many theories unsupported by evidence.
[2012-05-20 06:55:25] Noise509 - How do you know ...How do you know that your god exists? How do you know that the Hindu gods don't exists?
[2012-05-19 22:57:55] Rusty Shaks - God exists trust ...God exists trust me athiest you will find out very soon. Then you will look as stupid as these scientists.
[2012-05-19 22:54:29] DemstarAus - Science doesn't try ...Science doesn't try anything. It just so happens that God cannot hold up against critical thought - which is a crucial part of effective scientific process.
[2012-05-18 23:35:33] Rusty Shaks - I don't think ...I don't think anything, "created," us. That's a ridiculous idea. And we didn't evolve from monkeys, that just shows the depths of your knowledge of evolution. ^ ^ What you told me, idiot.
[2012-05-18 23:34:33] Rusty Shaks - That right there ...That right there makes more sense then half these tards... Regardless I would like to know wether we are supposed to know or not. I appreciate sciencde alot more then everyone is accusing me... I believe in God, I also realize how far we have come because of science... Why does science try to bash God?
[2012-05-18 23:31:27] Rusty Shaks - "(A scientific ..."(A scientific theory)... can never be proved right because tomorrow's experiment may succeed in proving what you thought was right, wrong." Richard Feynman
[2012-05-18 23:29:51] Rusty Shaks - Hells no dude, I ...Hells no dude, I believe but trust me science has done nothing but help us as a human race, the only problem is they can't figure out alot of shit, so arguments occure... Also they make up off the wall shit like saying that aliens put us on this planet because they don't believe in God and don't know how to answer how we became.
[2012-05-18 20:41:45] TheGreatHaste - No shit you don't ...No shit you don't believe in evolution, although it's a fact. I didn't say that you think we evolved either you fucking idiot, learn how to read. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of evolution is what I'm saying, but you clearly don't get that. And who are, "A lot," of scientists? That's bullshit, panspermia isn't widely believed at all. You can't cite your claim either, showing that you're full of shit. You're the joke here little boy. Science runs your life, by the way.
[2012-05-18 17:30:17] piobrick - "(A scientific ..."(A scientific theory)... can never be proved right because tomorrow's experiment may succeed in proving what you thought was right, wrong." Richard Feynman
[2012-05-18 17:03:40] JosephE2 - You're probably ...You're probably right, to some extent. I think the video was really trying to point out the stupidity of "young Earth" Christians and their complete lack of belief in science, or their completely baseless "science" they try to use to explain the universe. My mother is a devout Christian and does not deem herself worthy to tell God what method of making humans is acceptable. He just did it his way, and that's good enough for her. She is never offended by science, but she might be by this video.
[2012-05-18 15:11:20] CosmicConciousness - Believers sit ...Believers sit around and look for ways to undermine proven scientific facts. Look no further than the efforts to push intellegent design (a.k.a. creationism) in classrooms. This is a direct attack on the education of the next generation of children. If believers want to believe, that's their business. The problem is when they want to obstruct scientific learning of other.
[2012-05-18 05:52:58] Rusty Shaks - Watch "Spirit ...Watch "Spirit Science" start with chapter one and don't stop untill you get past 12... You will then believe there is more to life and death than just life and death.
[2012-05-18 05:50:25] Rusty Shaks - I will admit that I ...I will admit that I as well as many others are unable to graspe alot that is truelly out there... But I have seen too much "proof" that there is a God. Wether something created us or put us on this planet or we evolved from shit eating monkeys, I for one would like to know what the fuck is going on on this planet and would like to know how we came to be. IF there was more proof that we evolved from monkeys (other than a group of over paid scientists said so) I would believe it.
[2012-05-18 05:45:07] Rusty Shaks - I don't believe we ...I don't believe we evolved from monkeys... If you read my comment you would know that I do not believe we evolved into humans, you're putting words in my mouth and then calling me stupid for those words, asshole. Alot of scientists are saying aliens put us on this planet... So you calling me stupid for reffering to that theory you ARE ACTUALLY CALLING THOSE SCIENTISTS STUPID. You are a joke kid, you're talking more shit abvout your precious science than you are to me.
[2012-05-18 01:03:15] RbladerOS - Actually, there is ...Actually, there is evidence of our evolution. Search for "Genome sequencing leaves Creationists unable to respond" on youtube, and watch the top result. (Can't post links in comments) Also, why should something necessarily have created us? Is it just because (y)our intelligence or imagination is too limited to allow for reasonable explanations? Please respond using reason, and please refrain from fallacies or emotional responses.
[2012-05-17 21:48:54] TheGreatHaste - Why are you ...Why are you referring to science as a person? Science doesn't bash god, it just shows how stupid the idea is and it points out the contradictions associated with your little fantasy. You're full of shit by the way, the dogma of your religion sanctions non-believers (the majority of scientists) to hell. If that's not bashing, I don't know what is. They're also a lot smarter than you, moron. I wouldn't be calling them retards if I was you.
[2012-05-17 21:45:57] TheGreatHaste - I don't think ...I don't think anything, "created," us. That's a ridiculous idea. And we didn't evolve from monkeys, that just shows the depths of your knowledge of evolution. There is evidence, but I'm not surprised that you don't understand or take time to understand what is out there, considering you have such an asinine idea of evolution right now.
[2012-05-17 20:04:21] Rusty Shaks - Just because I ...Just because I believ in God DOES NOT MEAN that I take technologies and medical treatments for granted... Just because I believe in our creator does not mean I "attack science" this guy is stupid as fuck. It's not a battle between religion and science to believers, only to scientists. Why can't science research shit and make improvements without constantly trying to bash God? Believers don't sit around and talk shit about science retards so why are you doing it to us?
[2012-05-17 19:50:09] Rusty Shaks - Haha, so what do ...Haha, so what do you think created us? Aliens? Or did we evolve from monkeys even though there really isn't evidence of this. There is evidence of evolution, but not our evolution.
[2012-05-17 19:45:34] TheGreatHaste - I like how idiots ...I like how idiots actually believe in bullshit like the idea of a creator. It is actually funny.
[2012-05-17 07:31:06] Rusty Shaks - I like how people ...I like how people think it's "cool" to deny there own creator. Almost funny.
[2012-05-14 07:10:11] VarykGerai - in that sentence ...in that sentence its obviously a double button click typo. and stick your grammar police up your ass. its internet.
[2012-05-12 15:28:50] AuroraBeta003 - You are intelligent ...You are intelligent. I like that. Well claim that universe is expanding is fact, because we can see light from distant stars shifting to red, and we know that this happens when star is moving. I believe its called dopler effect. My point was, that person who choose theory for which there is no proof over theory for which there is proof, is simply mentally sick
[2012-05-12 15:13:14] piobrick - universe is a fact ...universe is a fact. This is an interpretation of the observation that light from distant stars is red-shifted.
[2012-05-12 15:11:39] piobrick - Thanks for thought. ...Thanks for thought. I totally agree with you about the distinction between fact and theory. However, concerning Varyk's post, I disagree. He has made a statement that the definition of scientific theory has changed. In order to make such a statement he should be prepared to support that claim with evidence. 1) What was the definition in the past? and 2) What is the definition now? Without this evidence, his statement is meaningless. BTW. I disagree with the idea that the expansion of the
[2012-05-12 03:36:26] AresExodus - Check your own ...Check your own grammar before throwing insults. The phrase 'do your research' does NOT require the use of 'you are'. In no context would 'do you are research' make sense.
[2012-05-11 18:54:37] VarykGerai - btw its you're not ...btw its you're not your, douchebag!
[2012-05-11 18:52:02] VarykGerai - piss off with your ...piss off with your gramar police!
[2012-05-11 12:59:11] AuroraBeta003 - Doesnt matter. In ...Doesnt matter. In science you see facts (for example,universe is expanding) and you create theory to explain those facts (why universe is expanding) This is right way how to approach things. Those theorys,which are created to explain facts are evidence based. For example. Fact is that universe expands. Theory explaining why this fact happens is that universe was once compacted and exploded(big bang theory). This theory is evidence supported,because we found heat waves left from big bang in 1965
[2012-05-11 11:23:15] AresExodus - No-one* They've* ...No-one* They've* Scientists* Rhetorically* Your*
[2012-05-08 23:08:31] VarykGerai - your* your*
[2012-05-08 23:08:16] VarykGerai - if you were to ask ...if you were to ask out of curiosity you can be shown how and why or do youre research, but obviously youre the one who asks rethoricaly, since you clearly didnt pay attention what he was saying in the very first sentence.
[2012-05-07 00:23:18] piobrick - Interesting. ...Interesting. Thanks for the response. Could you explain to me how the definition of a scientific theory has changed? What was it before and what is it now?